Electric Politics
 
Donate to Electric Politics
Green Party USA
Blank
CoffeeGeek.com
Blank
Whole Foods
Blank
Grist
Blank
Whole Foods
Blank
Whole Foods
Blank
Ben & Jerry's
Blank
Al Jazeera English
Blank
911Truth.org
Blank
Politics and Prose
Blank
Pluto Press
Blank
In These Times
Blank
CASMII
Blank
CounterPunch
Blank
News For Real
Blank
News For Real
Blank
The Agonist
Blank
Duluth Trading
Blank
Digital Photography Review
Blank
New Egg
Blank
Free Link

EP PODCASTSXML

February 22, 2008

War Mongers

Aboriginal maskFollowing my conversation about the Israel Lobby with John Mearsheimer in early January, I thought it would be helpful to take a more detailed look at the neo-cons. So I turned to Jim Lobe, Washington Bureau Chief of the Inter Press Service news agency, a recognized expert on the subject who knows probably almost as much about the neo-cons as they do themselves. Jim explains in a very straight-forward and thoughtful way how the neo-con godlings (my term) are out to create perpetual war. It was kind of Jim to talk with me and I hope we can do it again. Total runtime an hour and thirty one minutes. Enjoy!

Listen

« Kosovo Options | Main | A Vulture's Bonanza »



Comments

Great interview, George. Thanks.

The holocaust-driven worldview of the neocons is intriguing.

The French president Sarkozy (of Jewish ancestry) recently introduced the 'twinning' of nazi victims with French school children, which seemed a bit odd. Seeing that Sarkozy is the French equivalent of a Neocon, this makes more sense now.

One thing the neocons forget is that what brought about the rise of Hitler and thus the Holocaust, was a fearful, surveilled, terrorized and nonfree society with rigged elections. So why would the neocons pratice exactly the opposite of what they preach?


A really useful interview, George, much enjoyed.

Is Jim Lobe the first of your guests to almost agree with your working hypothesis regarding the Iraq war?


So far only Joel Bleifuss of In These Times agrees. Outside the podcast I believe Werther also agrees (at least with the weaker version of the hypothesis, e.g., 'that's OK if it happens'). It is, evidently, a minority view.

g.

Leave a comment