<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Electric Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 03:03:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.1</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Fat And Stupid</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/highfructosecornsyrup.jpg" alt="High fructose corn syrup graphic" align="left" />Americans <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-fructose_corn_syrup">consume</a> almost forty pounds of high fructose corn syrup per person, per year. That's a lot. (And, <i>thanks</i>, by the way, because federal corn price subsidies put me through graduate school.) Despite industry telling us that "sugar is sugar" it's not. High fructose corn syrup also contains an extensive list of questionable processing chemicals in trace form, some of which may well cause cancer. But quite apart from all that, new <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120515150938.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Latest+Science+News%29">research</a> shows that consuming high fructose corn syrup makes you stupid. Well, it does if you're a rat, but the research results presumably apply to humans too. Americans consume much more high fructose corn syrup per person, several times more, than the Europeans or Japanese, which we can now consider as an additional, plausible factor in explaining our relative political impairment.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/05/fat_and_stupid.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/05/fat_and_stupid.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 03:03:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Pup Pup</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/puppup.jpg" alt="the new puppy" align="left" />Here's the soon to be addition to the Kenney family. We visited a couple weeks ago when the pups were six weeks old. On Monday they'll be eight weeks old, ready for their new homes, and we'll pick ours up from <a href="http://www.deeprunretrievers.com/aboutdrf.htm">Deep Run Farm</a> (down near Warrenton, Virginia). Thanks, Phyllis, Jack and Kristi!! Everything seems pretty much organized for the pup's arrival but any last minute suggestions regarding dog training materials would be most welcome.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/05/pup_pup.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/05/pup_pup.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:41:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Foggy Bottom Follies</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/dupontetdupond.jpg" alt="Dupont et Dupond" align="left" />You immediately knew something wasn't right, watching the State Department spokesman using the words "according to" when talking about the interactions of U.S. diplomats in Beijing with Chen Guangcheng. "According to" diplomats who talked with Chen, he said... What? No. You use the phrase "according to" when you want to explicitly invoke uncertainty about the reliability of the source of a report. "According to" translates from diplo-speak as "maybe this was what was said, or maybe it wasn't, but this is what they said they said and you can decide for yourself." As applied here by one U.S. diplomatic official to another U.S. diplomatic official it means (a) those idiots at the American Embassy in Beijing don't know their rear ends from a hole in the ground, or (b) headquarters has no clue what really happened, or (c) both.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/05/foggy_bottom_follies.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/05/foggy_bottom_follies.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:37:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>America&apos;s Mad Cow Crisis </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>By <i>John Stauber</i></p>

<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/americanmeatinstitute.jpg" alt="1956 American Meat Institute ad" align="left" />Americans might remember that when the first mad cow was confirmed in the United States in December, 2003, it was major news. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had been petitioned for years by lawyers from farm and consumer groups I worked with to stop the cannibal feeding practices that transmit this horrible, always fatal, human and animal dementia. When the first cow was found in Washington state, the government said it would stop such feeding, and the media went away. But once the cameras were off and the reporters were gone nothing substantial changed.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/americas_mad_cow_crisis.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/americas_mad_cow_crisis.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:04:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Memory of Space and Time</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/curl.jpg" alt="Curl by Colette Calascione" align="left" />A fascinating, tricky thing, memory remains less than well understood. Is it just a set of synaptic connections or maybe something else? When we train memory, what exactly are we doing? In a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/magazine/can-you-make-yourself-smarter.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&partner=rss&emc=rss">discontinuous leap forward</a> it now appears that memory is an important basis &mdash; perhaps the most important basis &mdash; for what we label 'fluid intelligence.' And that a certain type of memory training has cross-over effects that significantly <i>raise</i> intelligence. (The military will be on this like white on rice.) To a materialist it may seem as though several fundamental questions about personhood and consciousness finally are being addressed. But I'd like to suggest an alternative gloss: by working distant, several-order memory functions one taps, perhaps, into prompts that go beyond self, into a kind of poetical inspiration, a mystical awareness independent of the human condition. Memory and forgetfulness. It's not all about us. [Graphic: Curl by <a href="http://www.nancyhoffmangallery.com/artist/display/12/Colette-Calascione">Colette Calascione</a>.]</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/memory_of_space_and_time.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/memory_of_space_and_time.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:49:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Server Upgrade Late Tonight</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/zendesign.jpg" alt="Small Zen design with rock and sand" align="left" />BlueHost is upgrading EP's server. The work will be done tonight and will involve a brief interruption in service at some point during the late Sunday night/early Monday morning hours. So if you notice the site has disappeared, not to worry. &nbsp; &nbsp; &#9786;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/server_upgrade_late_tonight.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/server_upgrade_late_tonight.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:48:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Podcast Schedule Late April/Early May</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/stjosephofcupertino.jpg" alt="St. Joseph of Cupertino" align="left" />This Friday my guest will be <a href="http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~rgomory/">Dr. Ralph E. Gomory</a>. Ralph is a former head of research at IBM and President Emeritus of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_P._Sloan_Foundation">Alfred P. Sloan Foundation</a>; currently he's a research professor at NYU. We talk about the virtues of protectionism <i>and</i> of class warfare. The Friday following, April 27th, for a sort of sequel, my guest will be the economist <a href="http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/person.html?id=chang&group=faculty">Dr. Ha-Joon Chang</a> of the University of Cambridge. On May 4th, for a different sort of sequel, to talk about our "<a href="http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/mar/20/age-of-ignorance/">Age of Ignorance</a>," my guest will be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Simic">Charles Simic</a>, the 15th U.S. Poet Laureate and Professor Emeritus at the University of New Hampshire. Then, on May 11th, for something more than a little different, my guest will be <a href="http://www.johnbalexander.com/biography">Col. John B. Alexander, Ph.D.</a>, talking about UFOs. John's background is unique, an intersection of special operations, the intelligence community, and very advanced R&D (as a civilian he was SES equivalent at Los Alamos National Laboratory) &mdash; 'a visionary' might be a good way to describe him. Somewhere in there I'll try to toss in an extra, much shorter interview about honeybee Colony Collapse Disorder with <a href="http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/faculty/chensheng-lu/">Dr. Alex Lu</a> of Harvard. And several irons are in the fire...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/podcast_schedule_late_aprilear.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/podcast_schedule_late_aprilear.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:24:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mitt Romney Cannot Be Elected President</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/henrywolf.jpg" alt="Henry Wolf image" align="left" />On cable television you see a raft of political experts, vying to be impartial, advising Mitt Romney to "be himself." To be the "likeable guy" all his friends say he is. On a more partisan note people like former Michigan Governor Jennifer M. Granholm <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-m-granholm/mitt-romney-is-a-hollow-m_b_1413876.html?ref=politics">argue</a> that there is no there there, that Mitt is a "hollow man." Both observations have merit but neither gets remotely close to the whole story. These and similarly tentative lenses fail to capture Mitt's real problem, namely Mormonism. In fact, nobody seems to want to talk about Mormonism, as if to do so were akin to the political incorrectness of barring transgender contestants from the Miss Universe Pageant. But unlike Catholicism, Protestantism, Judaism, Islam or other authentic major religions, where beliefs &mdash; for better or worse, whether right or wrong &mdash; are openly aired and argued over, in the cult of Mormonism the watchword is secrecy. Mr. Romney can no more talk honestly about who he is, or who he thinks he is, e.g., about secret Mormon doctrine, than he could raise his <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_garment">magic Mormon underpants</a> on a county courthouse flagpole. Even as intellectually degraded as Americans may be there aren't (yet) enough of us to take this particular hook without any bait. We're lucky for a change... Stipulating a two-way race I predict a landslide defeat for the Republicans.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/mitt_romney_cannot_be_elected.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/mitt_romney_cannot_be_elected.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:04:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Happy Easter!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/lambleg.jpg" alt="A generic leg of lamb" align="left" />It's 4:00 a.m. Do you know where your cook is? This year for Easter two of Sharon's kids came down from New York City. I figured I'd try something a little different with the Sunday lamb, so am improvising a Moroccan-style roast. I took a New Zealand semi-boneless leg of lamb, almost six pounds, and washed it with lemon juice. Then I made a paste of half a dozen large cloves of garlic, salt, pepper, turmeric, cumin, paprika, saffron and olive oil. Apart from the garlic and the saffron about a teaspoon each of everything else. Paste applied to lamb, lamb put on a rack in a heavy pan and tightly sealed with heavy foil, pan into a 220&deg; oven. To cook for about nine hours, basting occasionally. To finish at about 475&deg; uncovered, until crispy (15-25 minutes). In theory, you should be able to cut this with a spoon. We'll see... On the side, par-boiled baby potatoes browned in a frying pan with butter and chopped parsley; diced fresh carrots boiled with frozen peas; some mango chutney; some mint jelly; a nice Sancerre and a <i>very</i> nice Chianti Classico (for me). Also a store bought apple pie, but if I have the energy and find the motivation I may do something else for dessert. Yum!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/happy_easter.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/happy_easter.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 04:03:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Stand Your Ground</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/leedssurrealism.jpg" alt="Leeds police surrealism" align="left" />If a sworn police officer had shot and killed Trevon Martin that officer would, almost certainly, have had to surrender their weapon and be placed on administrative leave. And, in all probability &mdash; since Trevon Martin was unarmed (unless you count ice tea and skittles) &mdash; that officer would have subsequently been fired and then tried in a court of law. Stipulating the hypothetical, why then should civilians be held to a lower standard of accountability for shooting and killing one of their own? It's as if Florida has issued hunting permits for killing black people. What's distressing almost more than the killing itself is that it's taking so long to put Mr. Zimmerman behind bars. Florida won't do it. The only rational explanation there being that Florida cracker politicians are beholden to the 'Stand Your Ground' lobby. But the Feds won't do it, either. Presumably Mr. Obama is afraid of Florida voters in the November election. What an ugly mess... </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/stand_your_ground.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/04/stand_your_ground.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:34:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Moebius, at Work</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="425" height="318" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bfSV-Fdhm-0?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/moebius_at_work.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/moebius_at_work.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:08:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>A Really Big Litter</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/samparypups.jpg" alt="Sam & Pary's pups" align="left" />One of the above pups &mdash; one of the black males, to be precise &mdash; will be coming home to chez Kenney sometime in mid-May. The Sire, Sam, is a brilliant Master Hunter and the Dam, Pary (Parasol), is a very sweet tempered creature. We drove down to central Virginia and met the parents a few weeks ago and fell in love. The pups' <a href="http://www.deeprunretrievers.com/pedigree/sampary.htm">pedigree</a> is really impressive but as I don't expect to show, compete with, or breed our pup I'll probably get a 'limited' AKC registration. (On the other hand, as I'd prefer anyhow not to have the little guy fixed, and maybe if it's not hideously expensive, I'll bump the AKC papers up to a full registration, for bragging rights.) We'll go down again to see the pups when they're about six weeks old, and will pick ours up at eight weeks. What to name him? And we've got a lot of puppy proofing and preparation to do, including explaining all this to the cats... Woof!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/a_really_big_litter.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/a_really_big_litter.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:29:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>James Joyce Reading Finnegans Wake</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="425" height="246" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/N60Mo613VSY?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/james_joyce_reading_finnegans.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/james_joyce_reading_finnegans.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:34:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Podcast Schedule Late March/Early April</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/energyabstract.jpg" alt="abstract energy graphic" align="left" />For late March/early April we've got three great shows. On March 23d my guest will be <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Grant-F.-Smith/e/B001JRXLHM">Grant Smith</a>, talking about his recent book <i>Divert</i> (with an epilogue by Col. Pat Lang), on the NUMEC affair. Friday, March 30th, my guest will be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Asner">Ed Asner</a>, a real hero to me and a powerful force for good on the Left. Then, on April 6th, my guest will be <a href="http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/ethn/fac_staff/page50069.html">Dr. Timothy Messer-Kruse</a>, talking about his recent, riveting book <i>Trial of the Haymarket Anarchists: Terrorism and Justice in the Gilded Age</i> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), and about an <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/The-Undue-Weight-of-Truth-on/130704/">essay</a> he's written at the <i>Chronicle of Higher Education</i> on his experiences explaining &mdash; or, rather, failing to explain &mdash; the Haymarket history to Wikipedia. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/podcast_schedule_late_marchear.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/podcast_schedule_late_marchear.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:09:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Drat!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/watchmovement.jpg" alt="close-up of an antique watch movement" align="left" />Now it looks like scientists haven't found <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/science/einstein-proved-right-in-retest-of-neutrinos-speed.html?partner=rss&emc=rss">evidence</a> of faster than light particles after all. At least, not yet. But I'm still disinclined to believe that science has answered this question definitively. Heck, for all I know there's a faster than light universe out there with scientists who solemnly proclaim that nothing can move <i>slower</i> than the speed of light... I would think of it as a boundary question and I'm not so sure that science has tried to test it that way.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/drat.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2012/03/drat.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:05:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

