<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Electric Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:00:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.1</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>President Laughingstock</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/nobs.jpg" alt="No BS" align="left" />By this time it's fair to say that Mr. Obama is not merely a right of center politician, but a right-winger. There's nothing "centrist" about him. I wonder, though, whether it's <i>becoming</i> fair to say that he's a Manchurian Candidate, a plant, extreme in his support of the establishment which, by definition, is an oligarchic dictatorship? One sees the dawning recognition &mdash; from <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/harry-shearer/president-obama-speaks-to_b_698394.html">Harry Shearer</a> ("President Obama speaks to New Orleans From Planet Zarg") to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/25/letterman-obama-can-vacat_n_694084.html">David Letterman</a> ("He'll have plenty of time for vacations when his one term is up") &mdash; the comedians being, as usual, ahead of the curve. And I can't imagine that Mr. Obama's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/world/01obama-text.html?pagewanted=print">speech</a> last night impressed anybody except, of course, his courtiers in Versailles on the Potomac.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/09/president_laughingstock.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/09/president_laughingstock.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:00:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Up Where We Belong</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><iframe class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rLCk066o9sU" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/up_where_we_belong.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/up_where_we_belong.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:27:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lonesome Road</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><iframe class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NVF-0JKLnd4" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/lonesome_road.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/lonesome_road.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 02:23:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Fever-Tree</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/fevertree.jpg" alt="A selection of Fever-Tree beverages" align="left" />As a little kid in the Belgian Congo I drank a lot of tonic water. I don't know what brands, or how it was made, but I've had a taste for tonic water ever since. The problem is, most tonic waters &mdash; one might say <i>all</i> major brands &mdash; are crap. I seem to remember that as a teenager there were some here in the States that weren't too bad, but now, Blech! So the other day I was shopping in the new Whole Foods near here and noticed a brand I hadn't seen before: <a href="http://www.fever-tree.com/">Fever-Tree</a>. It's hideously expensive but I figured, what the hell, and tried some. It's great!! Out of this world great!! A real thirst quencher. And, to be honest, the 200 ml bottles are a good size. Most highly recommended.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/fevertree.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/fevertree.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:33:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Compromised Supply Lines</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/pakistanroadmap.jpg" alt="map of Pakistan's major road systems" align="left" />According to yesterday's <i><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/25/world/asia/25pstan.html?_r=1&ref=world">New York Times</a></i> Pakistan's floods are affecting the U.S. supply lines into Afghanistan. Well, yeah... I'd been looking at maps recently to try to figure what might be going on, and I've also noticed that until now there haven't been reports in the mainstream press. My guess is that the military has been discouraging reporters from writing up the story &mdash; note that Carlotta Gall's piece doesn't say a word about how constrained supplies to Afghanistan might affect operations. Of course, it will.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/compromised_supply_lines.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/compromised_supply_lines.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:17:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Chronicle of a Water War Foretold</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/boulderdam.jpg" alt="Boulder Dam poster" align="left" />Over at <i>Common Dreams</i> yesterday, Gwynne Dyer has a very thoughtful <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/08/21-1">piece</a> about Pakistan's water problems. Not the floods, but chronic and sure to become worse water shortages. A quick Google search turns up similar pieces <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/16/opinion/16solomon.html">here</a>, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/record-rains-ndash-but-pakistan-is-dying-for-water-2040617.html">here</a>, <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/asia-pacific/india-pakistan-water-treaty-poised-to-burst/article1652763/">here</a>, and <a href="http://terrorwonk.blogspot.com/2010/08/end-of-pakistan.html">here</a>. I hadn't realized how serious the situation already is, or that India and Pakistan are squaring off over proposed Indian dams. Grim. On my mental scorecard I'm upping the odds that Pakistan may fall apart in the medium term.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/chronicle_of_a_water_war_foret.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/chronicle_of_a_water_war_foret.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:46:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Of Mosques and Men</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/bluemosque.jpg" alt="Blue Mosque" align="left" />To be honest, I don't give a damn if Muslims build a mosque near ground zero. Even if I didn't think that 9/11 was an inside job it wouldn't bother me. Faith works in mysterious ways. If some Muslims want a mosque in lower Manhattan, well, OK. Would that be the same as the Germans building a monument to fallen Nazi soldiers at Omaha Beach? No, not by a long shot. Are Muslims irrelevant in today's American society, such that they should be steamrolled whenever politically convenient? No, and, by the way, have you checked your local hospital for Muslim physicians lately? So, what's up with President Twinkie's tap <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/white-house/why-the-mosque-matters-and-why.html">dance</a>, and Harry Reid's <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republicans-seize-ground-mosque-campaign-issue/story?id=11411490">disgracing</a> himself? Skittish, and pathetic!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/of_mosques_and_men.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/of_mosques_and_men.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:10:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Spiked</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/bruegheltowerofbabel.jpg" alt="Brueghel's Tower of Babel" align="left" />Fifteen years ago, or thereabouts, when I was on the other side of interviews, I had to get used to the idea that sometimes, when I'd taped an interview, the media person who'd asked for it might not use it. I recall, in particular, many times being interviewed by Andrea Mitchell up at NBC's studio in northwest DC (not far from me), but her later using maybe only one out of four or one out of five of them. I never asked for, and never got, a good explanation of why sometimes interviews don't get used, but over the years of producing the EP podcast I've learned that not all interviews should be broadcast, or webcast, or whatever it is that one calls it.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/spiked.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/spiked.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:00:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Further Parsing &quot;Birthright&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/frenchteatime.jpg" alt="tea time" align="left" />It's amusing to watch Keith Olbermann's artificial outrage against those who question birthright citizenship. And the more sincere outrage of other, non-professional leftists. The meaning of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment &mdash; if they stopped for a moment to think about it &mdash; did not, when it was ratified in 1868, absolutely and unambiguously allow birthright citizenship and, therefore, the Amendment's commonly accepted meaning having changed over time, those who defend birthright citizenship must be prepared to argue why their reading of the 14th Amendment is correct. Simply saying "the meaning of the words is obvious" begs the argument.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/further_parsing_birthright.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/further_parsing_birthright.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:20:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>In Praise of Pickles</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/mccutcheons.jpg" alt="McCutcheon's logo" align="left" />Bread and butter pickles. Yum! Good on sandwiches. Good as sides with things like hot dogs. For that matter, good on hamburgers. I suppose that the industrious among us make their own, no doubt deliciously. But in the supermarket it ain't easy to find exceptional bread and butter pickles. Most brands &mdash; including organics &mdash; taste pretty much the same. Bland. Then there's McCutcheon's. Their bread and butter pickles have both taste and snap. Zesty. Practically perfect. If you're in the DC area there's a good chance you can find McCutcheon's in a local store as their factory is in Frederick, Maryland; probably they distribute to a wider region, I don't know. Otherwise you could order from their <a href="http://www.mccutcheons.com/index.php">website</a>, which is, well, antique. I recommend their bread and butter pickles without reservation but other McCutcheon's products can be uneven. If you order a variety of samples on impulse you're on your own. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/in_praise_of_pickles.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/in_praise_of_pickles.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:45:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Logicomix</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XebglmXrgEc&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XebglmXrgEc&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/logicomix.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/logicomix.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:01:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Rescue Me</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PuHex_nxTCY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PuHex_nxTCY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/rescue_me.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/rescue_me.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:19:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Birthright Ballyhoo</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/bicycling.jpg" alt="Bicycling print" align="left" />In resisting birthright citizenship reform the Democrats have jumped the shark. Except, obviously, for Hispanics, most people understand and disapprove of "anchor babies." At the same time, most people don't understand the 14th Amendment and are hopelessly confused about the constitutional issues at stake. Republicans, betraying their chronic lack of intellectual firepower, are pushing for an Amendment to the 14th Amendment, which is constitutional overkill when simple legislation could provide a fair solution. Charitably, one might ascribe an abundance of caution to the Republican strategy except that it's pretty clear few of them have bothered to read through the relevant texts. Yes, it's a chore, but that's what legal precedent is all about.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/birthright_ballyhoo.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/birthright_ballyhoo.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:55:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Some Observations About Pizza</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/woodfiredpizza.jpg" alt="Wood Fired Pizza" align="left" />By all accounts pizza originated in Naples. In 1889 the Neapolitans added cheese, and in 1905 the pizza pie crossed the Atlantic, with Lombardi's opening in Manhattan. For a foodstuff so potentially delicious it's a relatively simple recipe &mdash; you'd think that restaurants usually get it right. But, no... it's impossible, for example, to find a good pizza in the Washington DC area.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/some_observations_about_pizza.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/some_observations_about_pizza.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:46:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Pakistan&apos;s Floods</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="photoLeft" src="http://electricpolitics.com/media/photos/pakistanflood.jpg" alt="Pakistan's Flood" align="left" />It isn't to be found among the top stories of the <i>New York Times</i>, although, to its credit, the <i>Washington Post</i> has <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/03/AR2010080300761.html">noticed</a>. From outward appearances neither the State Department nor the Pentagon have thought much about its ramifications. But floods in Pakistan are a huge deal, extremely relevant to whatever it is that the U.S. wants to accomplish over there. Our non-provision of substantial emergency aid could well have lasting consequences for the stability of Pakistan's government.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/pakistans_floods.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.electricpolitics.com/2010/08/pakistans_floods.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:25:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
