Electric Politics
 
Donate to Electric Politics

Green Party USA
Blank
Socialist Worker
Blank
CoffeeGeek.com
Blank
Grist
Blank
Whole Foods
Blank
Whole Foods
Blank
Ben & Jerry's
Blank
Al Jazeera English
Blank
911Truth.org
Blank
Sierra Trading Post
Blank
Black Commentator
Blank
Raising Sand Radio
Blank
Pluto Press
Blank
In These Times
Blank
USNI
Blank
In These Times
Blank
CASMII
Blank
CounterPunch
Blank
CounterPunch
Blank
News For Real
Blank
News For Real
Blank
If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger
Blank
News For Real
Blank
The Agonist
Blank
The Anomalist
Blank
Duluth Trading
Blank
Digital Photography Review
Blank
New Egg
Blank
Free Link

INTERMITTENT NOTESXML

The Value of Citizenship

Chinese braille nudeThe U.S. Constitution does not define citizenship. It was less an oversight than a concession to slavery that the process of defining American citizenship had to wait until after the Civil War, when the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, declared "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." In terms of Constitutional Amendments, up to the present, that's all that there is; thus, the definition of citizenship remains less than entirely clear. Though over the years the Supreme Court has ruled on a number of cases regarding citizenship issues, the conventional wisdom, that the Court has determined that a person becomes a citizen at the time of birth in the U.S., is not exactly true. The Court has never explicitly said, for example, whether or not, under the 14th Amendment, the children of illegal aliens are citizens. The closest the Court came was in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, in 1898, but in that case the question involved becoming a citizen at birth when the parents were in the country legally. Moreover, apart from the parents' legal status, additional extenuating circumstances not considered in Wong could conceivably apply. To put it bluntly, appropriate laws defining American citizenship have never been written, nor tested in court.

Very few states around the world grant citizenship as an unconditional birthright. Among advanced countries, only the U.S. and Canada do. Several, including the UK, Australia, France, and Germany, grant conditional birthright citizenship. It's obviously a complicated issue that deserves serious attention, or at least much more serious attention than it's ever been given in the United States.

Should American citizenship, indeed, be freely available to anyone whose mother is able to give birth in the U.S.? Forget for a moment about the fraught issue of illegal aliens, it's the principle of the thing. Should, for example, well-heeled Chinese expectant mothers be able to sign up for "citizenship tours"? According to an anonymous Embassy official, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing does not "deny someone [a visa] because you know they're going to the U.S. to have children." But that's simply preposterous. A Chinese tourist should have no more right to American citizenship for their child than Bonnie and Clyde had to rob banks.

At the time of its creation, America's political institutions and political thought were grossly immature, stunted by slavery. Over two hundred years later we have yet to grow up. If, when the need is pressing, we still can't achieve non-partisan agreement on fundamental first questions like the definition of citizenship, there's probably no hope for us.

« Democracy Deficits | Main | The Curious Case of Wikileaks »



Comments


Wonderful, thoughtful summation in your final paragraph... but some of us traditional "non-believers" cannot escape the "feeling" that hope never dies, even for those as undeserving as we may be.

[Thanks, Rich! g.]

Leave a comment