Electric Politics
 
Donate to Electric Politics

Green Party USA
Blank
Socialist Worker
Blank
CoffeeGeek.com
Blank
Grist
Blank
Whole Foods
Blank
Whole Foods
Blank
Ben & Jerry's
Blank
Al Jazeera English
Blank
911Truth.org
Blank
Sierra Trading Post
Blank
Black Commentator
Blank
Raising Sand Radio
Blank
Pluto Press
Blank
In These Times
Blank
USNI
Blank
In These Times
Blank
CASMII
Blank
CounterPunch
Blank
CounterPunch
Blank
News For Real
Blank
News For Real
Blank
If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger
Blank
News For Real
Blank
The Agonist
Blank
The Anomalist
Blank
Duluth Trading
Blank
Digital Photography Review
Blank
New Egg
Blank
Free Link

INTERMITTENT NOTESXML

A Former U.S. Ambassador Writes:

U.S. Department of State, It's not that my opinions are of critical import, but I am energized by the recent upsurge in articulate written concerns about the rapid and worrisome growth in the militarization of the United States. A former diplomat with two wartime tours of active duty with the paratroops, I am honored to lecture at DOD schools, working with men and women who are part of the nation's defense, but not responsible for its huge costs, in terms of money as well as international standing.

At a recent presentation, I told them of my reaction to the 2/8/09 color photo in the Post (M-13) of the U.S. Marine Band. In uniforms reminiscent of a production of The Student Prince, there were 122 musicians! Memory tells me that John Phillips Sousa got along famously with only 26 when he led it.

A Marine colonel among the participants pointed out, rather pointedly, that 'all Marines are trained as combat infantrymen.' I believe that is no longer the case, but did not challenge him, replying that I could picture the Band storming a beach. My problem was that I could visualize a bayonet on the end of a trombone, but on a piccolo? And here come the women members, holding up their floor-length black skirts and trying to help the guy struggling through the surf with the harp, impeded by the guys carrying the piano and kettle drums.

I added that no one should ignore the significant contributions made to the defeat of the Soviet Union by the Strolling Strings, the Singing Sergeants, the Navy Gypsy Band. And let's not forget the Airmen of Note, The Army's Madrigal Singers, and all of the others who have placed their fingers, lungs or vocal cords on the altar of Democracy. I carefully, seriously apologized for using humor to make a point (even the colonel smiled), and stressed my complete understanding and acceptance of the fact that you do whatever you are told to do in the service of the nation, to the very best of your ability. I reminded them that Secretary Gates has said there are far more full-time members of vocal and instrumental groups in the military than there are diplomats at State. When you calculate the lifetime costs of all those personnel, and all their dependents, the resulting numbers merit attention. Not because they constitute a really major slice of the overall burden, but because they rather compellingly demonstrate the impact of the growth syndrome resulting from the availability of all those billions. The size of the DOD budget demands tough, careful, constant, across the board control and monitoring — and does not get either one.

I would add this thought. From the financial and certainly the operational perspective, musical groups would appear to be infinitely more logical candidates for outsourcing the nation's defense than are security personnel, both at military installations here in the US and, as we should be learning, most definitely in overseas war zones.

« "Security" Zaps Our DNA | Main | Servile Surrealism in Celebration of Policy »



Leave a comment