Half-cocked Legislation
It's probably necessary to have some kind of a financial rescue package, but that wasn't the right one and it didn't come at the right time. For something allegedly so serious the Congress behaved irresponsibly in not giving the matter thorough consideration, including hearings. True, the Democrats significantly walked back the Administration's proposed give-away. But not by enough. Though Republicans in the House were not completely coherent in their objections, they had a better sense of the toxic nature of the thing than did the Democrats. I doubt the House leadership can manage on a re-vote to pass the very same bill, but significant changes in its language will take time to hammer out. Now, perhaps, we'll see whether Paulson was crying wolf. And if he was, that'll fundamentally alter the terms of the deal.
« Wait... What "Crisis"? | Main | Rosh Hashanah (Or, What's Up With Nancy Pelosi?) »





































Comments
David Sirota has a nice article:
http://tinyurl.com/4ph4tq
Posted by: benjamin777
|
September 29, 2008 6:35 PM
Congress wants to do something to stimulate the economy? Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley. This fiasco has shown that Sarbox does not work and it has driven way to many many investment overseas where the regulation is lighter.
If a recovery plan is to be it has to be limited. The Companies and investors have to take the hits not the taxpayers. There should be no special interest inserted into the legislation.
For Wall Street firms to qualify for the bailout they need to change their comp packages.
There must be no incentives for carelessness and stupidity...
Plain and simple...
Posted by: Throw Them Out | September 29, 2008 9:09 PM
From the Financial Times, a very insightful — must read — essay by Wolfgang Münchau.
Posted by: George Kenney
|
September 29, 2008 9:17 PM