The God-Damned Infantry
A friend of mine, a long time critic of the Iraq War, recently asked a young junior officer now stationed in Iraq for his opinion of the situation. He shared the officer's response with me, which is worth reading. It is a little naive about our intention to leave but that probably reflects what the junior officer is told by his seniors — army leaders may well be touting this line for reasons of "morale". (Slightly edited for spelling, punctuation, and content.)
"The war was a strategic mistake. The way I see it, Saddam Hussein was a secular leader and therefore a huge stumbling block to the spread of Islamic fundamentalism in the Middle East. Yes, he was an evil person and he was our enemy (since Gulf War I) but he was also an enemy of Bin Laden and the Shia extremists, etc. If he did have WMDs, he would have used them for regional influence. He never, however, would have given them up to terrorists or risked provoking the US by using them against us. Now, with Saddam gone we have a vacuum that can only be filled by Shia extremists who are more of a terrorist threat than Saddam.
"As far as things on the ground, the outlook isn't much better. In my opinion, what everyone fails to realize is that this is not a counterinsurgency. If we wanted to stay in Iraq, then it would be a counterinsurgency. But it is clear that our goal is to turn over power and pull out. So, in building our strategic endstate, it's pointless to set goals that relate to our presence in Iraq. If the "insurgency" is a function of our being there, then it is not an insurgency in terms of our endstate. For example, if one of our goals is to stop IED attacks on US forces, that is pointless. When we leave, there will be no more IED attacks on us forces. So our endstate needs to be different. We need to ask "if we left tomorrow, what would happen in Iraq?" and from there, we need to determine which of those anticipated results are unacceptable to us. Then we must aim our efforts on making sure those unacceptable results do not occur.
"When I look at the problem that way, it becomes almost impossible to find a purpose in what we do. Regardless of what we do, the Shia are going to take control. They have completely infiltrated all the security forces. The only kind of leader who could keep them in check was a tyrant like Saddam. And when the Shia take control, as soon as we leave, they are going to be as brutal as they like against the Sunni and there will be little we can do about it. That is what will happen whether we leave tomorrow or in ten years.
"As far as the foreign fighters, they will leave Iraq when we do. So what are we trying to accomplish here? Train the Iraqi forces? History shows that training forces in the Middle East can backfire. Any training we offer these people will find its way to our terrorist enemies.
"Things are heating up as well. The Shia are getting more aggressive. We lost a man the other day and another was seriously wounded a week or so later. We're facing a high risk with little potential payoff.
"We are able to make a difference at the local level. Some of the people are very kind and appreciate our help. That is the only positive thing I can see coming out of this."
Very Respectfully,
Junior Officer "X"
« For God's Sake, Don't Mention the War! | Main | Tibetan Splendor »





























Comments
Interesting report. Thank you for sharing it.
To the Junior Officer, I can only say "you are there to secure the oil son — and you are there for as long as it takes. Not necessarily to make it flow, just to secure it and insure that the USA determines who gets it. Just as British soldiers (most from India) did for the Crown 90 years before you.
"Yes, it took a tyrant to secure Iraq before, but don't worry. It isn't the Shia who will fill the vacuum. We are quite up to the task. We do not respect international law, we torture prisoners at will, and we don't count the bodies of collateral damage. As for money — cost is no object, we'll print more."
Same crap, different century.
Posted by: 8isis8
|
March 25, 2008 4:50 AM